Madam Rodham?

February 11, 2008 · Print This Article

Hey kids, how many euphemisms can you find in this post?

It appears that MSNBC is up to its old tricks again. This time, anchor David Shuster is in the hot seat for his latest ejaculation, in which he suggested that the Clinton campaign had “pimped out” daughter Chelsea for campaign tricks. In response, Clinton’s communication director, Howard Wolfson bitched to the media, suggesting that the comment was “‘beneath contempt’ and disgusting.”

Such looseness in the media is difficult to swallow, and as such, jeopardizes subsequent debates on the network. Hillary was scheduled to be whored out again on February 26th, in which she would pander to an audience in a debate with Barack Obama (The Big “O”). The comment has likely blown that debate, and any future debates on the network. Hillary’s campaign is now forced to walk the streets, lusting after another venue in which higher standards would be kept.

On a side note, no solicitations for apology were ever made over Keith Olberman, who would consistently get his nut with attacks against the Bush administration.

Source: Breitbart - MSNBC’s Chelsea Comment Angers Clinton

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • e-mail

Comments

2 Responses to “Madam Rodham?”

  1. Peter Cliton on February 11th, 2008 7:21 pm

    The douchebag report has got it right on Hillary. A guy named ZakP has nominated Hillary for douchebag of the year, she has my vote and I think she could double up and also take cunt of the year! As for the presidency hell no. Has anyone out there read it takes a douchebag, its Hillary’s mien kampf.

  2. admin on February 12th, 2008 2:53 pm

    Thanks for the feedback. She’s on the right path for being douchebag of the year to be certain.

You got comments? Oh yeah, you do...





Powered by WP Hashcash



  • HOME · REPORT A DOUCHEBAG · DOUCHEBAG HONOR ROLL · DOUCHEBAG TV · LOGIN / REGISTER
    Google