Pedophile Terrorist Naser Jason Abdo Tries, Fails To Mug Liberals With Reality

The latest devout follower of the Religion of Peace, Naser Jason Abdo, was arrested Tuesday after arousing the suspicions of a Killeen, Texas gun shop employee. Abdo was already a star of the Far Left, having somehow convinced the Army that the Muslim religion he shares with such well-known pacifists as Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein made him a conscientious objector, unable to serve his country in Iraq or Afghanistan.

Why a Muslim would join not only the Army but the infantry, in a time of war and then suddenly realize, “wait, this job involves killing Muslims?” indicates that Abdo had to be, if you’ll pardon the military jargon, some kind of ASVAB-waiver.

Now, to be considered a conscientious objector, not only do you have to demonstrate that you oppose the current war you’re being asked to fight in, but all wars. So, according to CNN, Abdo ran with the kind of malarkey that our liberal friends love to hear from Muslims.

“Islam is a much more peaceful and tolerant religion than it is an aggressive religion,” he said. “I don’t believe that Islam allows me to operate in any kind of warfare at all, including the U.S. military and any war it partakes in. I believe that our first duty as a Muslim is to serve God.”

So it looked like Abdo was going to get free an clear of his military obligation until May 13th, when he was arrested after child pornography was discovered on his computer.  After a legal hearing recommended that Abdo face a court martial, the Muslim soldier-cum-pacifist-cum-pedophile decided to add deserter to his resume and went AWOL.

Now, it appears that Abdo loves peace the same way he wants to love children after he was arrested and bomb-making materials, guns,  military uniforms and jihadist literature were found in his hotel room.

Over at Death & Taxes, Andrew Belonsky‘s first concern is “How Will Right Respond To Fort Hood Plot?” That’s right, a second incident of a Muslim serviceman trying to kill his fellow soldiers at the Fort Hood, where Nidal Malik Hasan first voiced opposition to the war and then opened fire on American soldiers, killing 13 and wounding 29…and the view through the liberal lense is one of fear that people might look at Muslims with suspicion.

…we’re seeing an uptick in politically expedient Islamophobia, and it’s entirely conceivable that GOP leaders and their adherents will use Abdo’s Muslim heritage to rally their troops. I mean, just look at Herman Cain, a socially conservative pledge blasting Sharia law and Rep. Peter King’s “Muslim radicalization”hearings.

Would “Islamophobia” be so politically expedient if American Muslims were a little more eager to serve and protect the country and a little less willing to side with our enemies and kill us?